Collective self-defense offensive

In the past day, the Abe Cabinet has been on the offensive on the question of the review of the prohibition on the right of collective self-defense.

Yesterday, Prime Minister Abe said at a press conference, “As the era changes, I want to have a debate about how the constitution should be interpreted.”

At the Diet, controversial LDP PARC chairman Nakagawa Shoichi gave a speech explaining the thinking behind the collective self-defense study group. (The same article reports that in accordance with Chief Cabinet Secretary Shiozaki’s reassurance that any recommendations made by the study group will go through the normal LDP policy channels, Ishiba Shigeru, JDA director-general under Koizumi and currently chairman of the LDP-PARC National Defense division, Defense Policy Investigative Subcommittee, will spearhead the debate.)

Then, today, Defense Minister Kyuma reiterated to the press the points made by Abe yesterday about the importance of reviewing the constitutional interpretation that prohibits the exercise of the right of collective self-defense.

The Abe Cabinet’s push behind the review is important, perhaps more important than the push to revise the Constitution — because reinterpreting the constitution to permit collective self-defense, even in limited cases, is a far easier way of strengthening Japanese security policy than revising the constitution. Should the government succeed, it will impact the US-Japan alliance immediately, directly, and concretely.

Perhaps this reflects a tactical shift by the cabinet, recognizing that with constitution revision a distant prospect, the government’s efforts are better spent trying to realize a very real policy shift in the short term. There is probably a PR element too, allowing Abe to demonstrate to President Bush this weekend that his government is pushing all-out for a more generous reinterpretation of the constitution.

But make no mistake: reinterpreting the constitution would be a hugely important step in the normalization of Japanese security policy.

One thought on “Collective self-defense offensive

  1. Anonymous

    Interesting to see a practical, case-analysis approach will be taken by the group of experts who will provide the eventual policy window-dressing for what must surely be a \”done-deal\” political decision to order the Cabinet Legislative Bureau to come up with a new \”interpretation\” on how Japan will be allowed to exercise its right of collective self defense.Four specific scenarios will be studied:(1) If a ballistic missile is launched towards an ally, can a JSDF missile defense system be used to shot it down?(2) If U.S. Navy and JMSDF warships are transiting together, in international waters, and the USN ship is attacked, can the JMSDF shoot at the attackers to help defend the USN vessel?(3) If JSDF units are operating with military units from other countries for a common purpose (e.g., the coalition in Iraq), what actions can JSDF take in case a another country\’s military unti is attacked.(4) What forms of military logistics support can be provided to the military units of other countries? (Currently the list of items restricted to non-combat items such as food and fuel, etc.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s