The substance of the speech was familiar enough. He opened by reiterating what I’ve previously described as the twin themes of the DPJ’s campaign narrative: “regime change” (Hatoyama used the phrase “major cleanup” in this speech) and “livelihoods first.” Discussing his government’s plans for cleaning up the policymaking process and changing the relationship between politicians and bureaucrats, the prime minister showed once again that the DPJ’s plans are clearest when it comes to reforming Japanese governance. From strengthening political leadership within ministries to dissolving the administrative vice ministers’ council to creating new cabinet committees to stripping the DPJ of its policymaking bodies, the Hatoyama government is consciously erecting a new system of government. And in the name of conducting government with the public interest in mind, his government is changing how public money will be budgeted, shifting the focus of budgeting “from concrete to people” in Hatoyama’s words.
But more than changing how public money is spent, Hatoyama stressed that in the name of “fraternity” his government would work to protect the most vulnerable members of Japanese society, a focus that has particular resonance after the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare’s recent report on poverty in Japan found that the trend detected in a 2003 OECD report has continued (as of 2006), with 15.7% of the public’s earning less than half the median income, placing Japan as fourth-worst in the OECD.
The speech was by and large a composite of Hatoyama’s campaign speeches, his essay in VOICE, and his speech at the opening of the UN General Assembly in September. Drawing from the VOICE essay, he reiterated the importance of bolstering Japanese civil society and community, and, in words reminiscent of Ozawa Ichiro’s speech at the DPJ convention in January, said that Japan needs an “economy for human beings.” He repeated the DPJ’s emphasis on the need for focus on values other than economic growth, that his government would, while promoting economic competition, would also work to support employment and foster skills, build a safety net, and pursue consumer-oriented goals like food safety. This kinder, gentler economy will be joined with greater activism by citizens in education and the provision of health and welfare in their communities.
On foreign policy, he once again stated his ambition for Japan to serve as a “bridge” internationally. He wants Japan to take the lead on climate change and energy issues, nuclear non-proliferation, and cooperation in Asia — and he wants to cooperate with the US on these global issues. He repeated the DPJ’s desire for an “equal” relationship with the US, and stated that the equality of which he speaks refers to an equal partnership to combat the aforementioned global problems. In other words, an equal US-Japan relationship is one focused on issues other than the bilateral security issues that have crowded the bilateral agenda since the early 1990s, issues like the future of the US military presence in Okinawa. The Obama administration should appreciate that the Hatoyama government is no less eager to move on to other areas of cooperation, but that it wants the best deal possible for the people of Okinawa — and the prime minister, his cabinet, his party, and his coalition partners clearly do not believe that the current plan is the best possible deal.
If the content of Hatoyama’s address adds little to what we already know about what Hatoyama and his government want to accomplish, I think the speech tells us much about the kind of prime minister Hatoyama is becoming. As I wrote in early September when Hatoyama was assembling his cabinet, it appears that Hatoyama is governing as first among equals in a cabinet of heavyweights, with the help of an inner cabinet of two or three close advisers. An Asahi article describes the Hatoyama cabinet as being characterized by cabinet ministers submitting policy proposals, often by floating trial balloons in the media, while the prime minister, with the help of Kan Naoto, the deputy prime minister and head of the national strategy office, Hirano Hirofumi, the chief cabinet secretary, and Sengoku Yoshito, head of the administrative reform council, decides which policies to approve. The government will face a test as it attempts to whittle down the gigantic first draft of the 2010 budget, but I think that it is unlikely that this basic pattern will change. Hatoyama has referred to himself as a “conductor-like” prime minister. His orchestra may at times be cacophonous — especially with Kamei Shizuka in the mix — but I see open debates among ministers regarding national policy better than the alternative of discussions among bureaucrats behind closed doors. That said, whether the Hatoyama system succeeds as a vehicle for implementing policies remains to be seen.
Meanwhile as the conductor Hatoyama will undoubtedly continue to give speeches that may be maddeningly vague as far as policy is concerned but will offer regular reminders of his government’s mission to his subordinates in the cabinet, his party’s backbenchers, and the public at large.
Slowly but surely a new system of government is taking shape in Japan.
7 thoughts on “Hatoyama restates his government’s mission”
I don't watch too much TV over here but last night was devoted to the Hatoyama speech and the drug trial that started a few months ago (WHO CARES???).All of the commentary on the speech was that it was too long almost doubling the length of any speech since Koizumi. They also focused on his use of \”Yuai seiji,\” a term Ichiro Hatoyama used to use.It was also interesting to see the LDP Party Leader act like a Republican and say that the DPJ response to the speech was much like the reaction to Hitler's speeches (or the DPRK). The LDP continues to borrow pages from the Republican Party's playbook, which doesn't make sense since the Republicans are only marginalizing themselves in the US for their almost extremist comments… I guess that's what you have to do when you have no other ideas…
\”I see open debates among ministers regarding national policy better than the alternative of discussions among bureaucrats behind closed doors.\”Indeed. But unfortunately we are still going to have to put up with the usual commentators claiming that differences among cabinet members is a sign of wholesale division of the party. And anyone who thinks, as per LDP criticism, that these \”speeches from the throne\” should be used to outline detailed methods of financing policy is just deluding themselves. They are, and always will be, a PR opportunity.
\”I see open debates among ministers regarding national policy better than the alternative of discussions among bureaucrats behind closed doors.\”One only has to tune in the UKs Parliamentary debates, especially PMQs to witness this style.Civil servants just implement the policy made by the Govt., after an open debate, not create it.
Few sights in Politics as rousing and amusing as Question Time in the UK or Australia in full swing. Very entertaining.Not as entertaining as certain other governments in Asia that have taken \”robust democracy\” a bit far with brawling on the floor of Parliament, but nonetheless.
\”the prime minister showed once again that the DPJ's plans are clearest when it comes to reforming Japanese governance.\” Indeed. I can't help but think that the DPJ may make great changes in the relationship between politicians and bureaucrats only to squander the opportunity for progress on warm and fuzzy concepts that get Japan nowhere.Reduce carbon emissions while making gasoline and highways cheap…. Providing an increased safety net for the needy while lowering the deficit…. A more equal relationship with the US without more defense spending….What is the DPJ going to do with the power that the wrestle away from the bureaucrats? I doubt that it will be much unless they are willing to make some hard decisions between the lesser of multiple bad choices.
Mr. Harris,A lot of anxieties over Mr. Hotoyama’s stated intention to review US-Japan alliance policy are hitting the headlines on both sides of the Pacific—main theme being will Mr. Hatoyama risk Japan’s benefits from the alliance. No one, however, is asking the opposite—the US’s benefits.The Prime Minister is either a fool or a naive politician—the risk avers questioners seem to be saying—the Prime Minister doesn’t see the whole picture?My perspective is—what does the Prime Minister have up his sleeves? And more interestingly and to the point—what does President Obama think of all this. Probably, not much—the President will pull a rabbit and make a deal—and so will the Prime MInister. These gentlemen did not get to where they are in life by making a habit of getting stuck on words, or ego—this can be said without any risk.
Perhaps one day, in true parliamentary style, the fat cat beaurocrats will be treated like this, as they should be!:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8337185.stm